Party of One
I'm probably the only right-winger in the country who watched this video and was primarily frightened by the bad counterpoint:
Labels: Counterpoint, Culture
I'm probably the only right-winger in the country who watched this video and was primarily frightened by the bad counterpoint:
Labels: Counterpoint, Culture
I must not be irredeemably evil because, even though I loathe Mies, my first reaction to this news was, "that's terrible."
Labels: Architecture
Via SF Signal I found some anecdotal evidence that students have not yet quite given up the reading habit. Look at this reading list! Like some who left comments, I've got to wonder if this sample skews smart, but even so, wow.
Labels: Culture
Neal Stephenson
came last night to Nicola's Books in Ann Arbor to sign copies of his new novel Anathem. He rocked, but I was especially
interested in the crowd, which self-selectively skewed nerdy (of course) but also less
unhip than you would expect. All of the questions from the audience were
coherent and succinct; a few of the more intense fans seemed to be bursting with the
urge to make long, arcane speeches, but resisted admirably. The signing line
moved more than twice as fast as I estimated, and in general I found the crowd
conforming to my personal preferences (for efficiency and public reticence) to a
higher degree than any I can remember. We Neal fans are ... special.
So, what's modernism good for, anyway? Gas stations, definitely. (Hat tip to Design Observer.)
How much cooler would Goliath be if he fought David in a powered armor suit? Way cooler!
Labels: GraphicNovel, OldTyme, Religion
Michael Blowhard, drink your heart out: I found another raw milk production shut-down story, and it's got a local angle. I agree with the tone set by the author, who sounds open-minded but unconvinced about the possible benefits of raw milk and the organic movement generally (in my case, call me a full-blown skeptic of organic). Yes, the crack-down is way out of proportion to the crime.
I'm listening to some Sibelius right now on a disc from the local library. It's made by Ondine, a label out of Helsinki. Having an eye for detail as I do--that is, an eye for detail so long as it is irrelevant--I noticed this warning in fine print on the cover: "Unauthorised copying, hiring, lending, public performance and broadcasting of this record prohibited." Unauthorized lending? Is my local library engaging in unauthorized activity here? Should the library expect a raid from the Helsinki stormtroopers anytime soon? I'm just relieved that unauthorized borrowing was left off the list. Yikes.
Labels: Culture
It's opera and it's science fiction, so you'd think I would be compelled to comment, but I've been avoiding linking to news of The Fly since I figured out the show included nudity. I'm not exactly one with a finger on the pulse of the opera world, but isn't new opera pulling a Britney/Janet/Jennifer and turning to skank to shore up the sagging popularity? Anyway, now that we have a review, and it has turned snarky ("The Fly is a dog" is not what he said, but what he meant), I almost feel sorry for poor David Cronenberg et al. Okay, I don't feel sorry at all. And the review contains a bit of truly wonderful advice that could have helped more than one recent would-be opera composer:
"The Fly" isn't even an interesting failure. It's just amateurish. It isn't even good enough to be offensive. Shore, noted for composing music for such films as "Ed Wood," "The Lord of the Rings," and, yes, "The Fly," has no business writing an opera. But how could he know until he tried, you ask?(When Matel comes out with its very first composer doll, and you pull the string, that's what you'll hear it say: opera is hard.)
Well, he couldn't, but you don't try it out on an audience at the Chatelet in Paris, where it debuted in July, and then take it to Los Angeles Opera. You write a scene, get a graduate seminar class at some music school to give it a run-through, and then go back to the drawing board, humbled by what you've heard. Opera is hard. A man's got to know his limitations.
You might expect me to link to news of Ananthem, the new novel by SF author Neal Stephenson, because I'm a fan of SF and a huge fan of NS, and, yes: perhaps I will get around to it eventually. Today, instead, I'd like to link to an interview with NS about the book because of this comment:
I asked Stephenson whether he felt that cell phones in our own world might represent a wrong turn, technologically speaking. He said:I now own a cell phone, but only because the Wifeösphere bought it for me. However, it is almost never on, and frequently I forget to take it with me. I resent the appalling manners of many cell phone users--exactly why does a cell phone justify you cutting me off in mid-sentence just because it happens to be ringing?--and, to reinforce the point NS is making elsewhere in the interview, constant conversation is a distraction from serious thinking. Gee, you'd almost think people were looking for a distraction.
I couldn't live without mine. But the etiquette and the interface are lagging behind the technology. Introduction of new technology often leads to disruptions in manners that can take a generation or more to play out. We're in one of those awkward times now.
The one headline I did not expect to read today: Black Bear Busts Secret Utah Pot Farm.
Labels: Choral, Creativity, Design
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
Umie the Umlaut says, "ask your doctor about the Fredösphere!"